of the Day - 11/14/10

[Refugee 7]

Do tell!

[DCAHNM 0]

I say no.

[Echosoftom 3]

I tend to think they might have. But not permanently, more like a one time thing.

[LizzieB 0]

Probably, but just a once off type thing.

[Patty Petty 9]

I said probably, for a one time thing or something.

[SingsInFrench 262]

I agree, a one-time thing, maybe for a fundraiser for some type of cause.

[Pawie 6]

I said No, thinking more long term. For an occational gig, Maybe.

[Amber 70]

No. I don't think John wanted to. He wasn't keen on reliving the past.

[nurktwin 2,143]

i said probably, cuz John has been gone 30 years and the Beatles have been gone 40 years. that's a lot of time to get over and heal things. i don't think it would have been anything permanent, but maybe get together now and then to record something together. i think its safe to say they would never do a tour. but it sure would have been nice to get a new Beatle album every christmas for the past 40 years!!! here's a question for you, if the Beatles were alive and well and still recording, would todays music be different (non Beatle music)? or would the Beatles still be the trend setters and everyone follow and try to imitate them?

[Refugee 7]

I have no idea if they would have or not. I would like to believe they would have, maybe not long term, but like Led Zep did recently, a one time thing.

[wild1forever 152]

Probably, but only for a show or two.

[agirl 0]

No, I think both Paul and John were finished with the whole Beatle thing.

[Sugar 0]

I would like to imagine they would have for a charity of some kind.